Pages

Pageviews last month

Thursday, 9 December 2010

WHAT WAS AGREED -- on the hoof, mushrooms blooming

Agenda Item 42

Beach Chalet Letting Policy Proposal

Amended Recommendations

    1. That the Cabinet Member for Culture, Recreation and Tourism approves the introduction of a fixed term tenancy for a maximum period of five years for all new beach chalet tenancies which will be available for Brighton & Hove residents only.
    1. As stated VIZ: 2.2 That the Cabinet Member for Culture, Recreation & Tourism approves the proposed 10% increase in the annual rent for chalets.
    1. That the Cabinet Member for Culture, Recreation and Tourism approves a consultation exercise on amending the policy for letting beach chalets to existing tenants. The aim of the consultation exercise being to reduce the long standing waiting lists.
2.4  That the Cabinet Member for Culture, Recreation and Tourism approves the implementation of a two month notice period to end tenancies when the tenant is not complying with their maintenance responsibilities.


Wednesday, 8 December 2010

Council changes the proposals

chalet proposals (amends the original proposals)

new tenants get max: 5 year term only,
old tenants to be consulted on how to reduce the waiting lists,
10% rent increase (same proposal) -
Eviction notice if chalet not maintained properly.

more to follow when council organises the consultation.....

Monday, 6 December 2010

the sounds of mushroom growing................


 The officer who did the original report has sent this reply to a ward cllr:
 
The item is not being withdrawn, however, amendments are being considered which I hope will alleviate your concerns.

the sounds of mushroom growing................

saltdean hit back

Dear David
I am concerned that it is proposed to change the letting policy for the council owned brick built beach chalets without prior consultation with existing beach chalet tenants.The first that the tenants based at Saltdean knew of the proposal was via The Argus news story of Wednesday 1st December this year which in effect deprived them of the opportunity to address your Culture,Recreation&Tourism cabinet member meeting on 7th December.
Whilst I fully support the potential for new tenants to enjoy the benefits of renting a beach chalet I believe it is unneccessary to alter the existing tenancy arrangements to allow this to happen.A clause already exists in the present  arrangements to evict those tenants who do not maintain their chalet to the standard that the council demands of them.Take the example of those chalets situated at Rottingdean.The vast majority of them have not had their doors painted annually to the councils specification.If the council enforced its clause relating to maintanance I believe that immediately twenty eight chalets could be offered up to new tenants.
Whilst it may be the case that elsewhere in the city the chalets are little used even at the height of summer it is certainly not the case at Saltdean where many of the chalets are regularly used throughout the whole year.In fact a vibrant community exists amongst Saltdean beach chalet tenants which has very positive benefits for all residents of and visitors to Saltdean.
It was beachutters who successfully campaigned a number of years ago to ensure that beach provision at Saltdean was not lessened when the beaches were reconfigured,it was beachutters who campaigned to ensure that we did not lose toilet facilities at the seafront,it was beachutters who campaigned to ensure that we did not lose disabled parking facilities and it is beachutters and friends who regularly undertake litter picks on the beaches at Saltdean to clear broken glass and rubbish to help to make sure that those beaches are safer and more pleasant for everybody to use.
Please do not penalise this community of interest and remove their tenancies when a mechanism already exists for you to achieve your noble aim of allowing more local residents to enjoy the benefits of the beach chalets.
Indeed to my knowledge there have been at least six changes of tenancy amongst the twenty Saltdean beach chalets in recent years due to deaths and tenants deciding to not renew their tenancy.
Thankyou for your time in reading this
Kind regards

Saturday, 4 December 2010

crap press release dated nov 29th

Moves to cut beach chalet waiting list

A novel plan to share out Brighton & Hove’s limited supply of beach chalets is being considered by the council.
It would mean 100 existing brick-built chalets being offered for limited periods, instead of being rented indefinitely by individuals.
The council is stressing the scheme would not affect Hove’s wooden beach huts which are owner-occupied and can be bought and sold on the open market.
A council report says the move would address the current situation where over 100 people are languishing on a waiting list – some for over 10 years.  At the same time, says the report, the council gets regular complaints that many chalets appear unused, even in the height of summer.
Officials are suggesting chalets could be offered with leases for a maximum period of five years.  Anyone who has held a lease for over five years may keep it for a further two years.  People holding a lease for under five years may keep it until that period elapses.
A decision is expected at one of the regular meetings led by cabinet councillor for culture David Smith, on December 7.
It is also proposed that rents would go up by 10 per cent.  Officials say prices would be comparable to those in other resorts yet earn the authority an extra £50,000.
Current prices range from over £700 a year for chalets with water and electricity to about £400 for basic chalets in less favoured positions.
There are groups of brick-built chalets in Hove, Madeira Drive, Ovingdean, Rottingdean and Saltdean.
Waiting lists would be closed to non-residents – they presently include a handful from outside the city.
Once a tenancy expires the person would be able to return to the bottom of the waiting list.
Cllr Smith said:  “These are publicly-owned assets so it seems unfair to have residents effectively permanently excluded from them in a queue which never moves.  It could be that charging more would make people more committed to using them - or giving them up if they don’t.”

more from the argus

i made a comment, too --
 THE TORIES :  they will also start advocating evicting council house tenants so that someone else can 'have a turn'........

MADEIRA DRIVE 23 chalets: more from the argus

MADEIRA DRIVE 23 chalets: more from the argus